All posts by James Clay

Sketchnoting at ALT-C

This week I was in Glasgow for the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C). This year it is shorter.

While I was there I did a couple of sketch notes of two of the keynotes.

My sketch notes are really for me, rather than other people. The process of sketching allows me to digest for myself what is been talked about and demonstrated. The sketch note provides me with a mechanism that provides a process for my interpretation of what is being said and what I understand from the talk. The process of sketching engages me in the talk in ways in which note taking does for others or conversing on social media.

The first of these was from Charles Knight.

Being a leader, not an algorithm: Human skills for an AI-Shaped Future

Artificial Intelligence as a contested technology, is increasingly positioned as the solution to every challenge, from assessment to personalisation, efficiency, and leadership.  In this keynote, Dr Charles Knight, Director of Leadership, Governance and Management at Advance HE, will explore the intersection of leadership and technology, asking: what uniquely human skills and behaviours ATL members need to thrive? Drawing on insights from leadership practice, digital innovation, and organisational development, this session will challenge assumptions and surface blind spots, and argue for a very human set of skills.

The second was the keynote by Gabi Witthaus.

Engaging Learning: Rethinking Inclusion with Insights from the Margins

This talk is about how learning designers can foster more inclusive student participation in online learning by considering four key dimensions of engagement—cognitive, behavioural, social, and emotional. Student engagement is important because it is correlated with retention, especially for students living in precarious circumstances. There is evidence that engagement in any one dimension can fuel engagement in the others—and the corollary is also true: disengagement in one dimension can cascade into others, fuelling broader disengagement. I will argue that while academia tends to value the cognitive and behavioural, for some students—especially those in contexts of conflict, crisis and displacement—social and emotional engagement may be critical to the successful completion of their studies.

Reforming Higher Education – Weeknote #347 – 24th October

The big story this week was the publication of the e government’s post-16 education and skills white paper.

What is in the post-16 education and skills white paper for higher education? Well WonkHE as per usual does a really good job of analysing what was in it for higher education.

In terms of strategic ambition, there are five objectives for the sector: economic growth, a high quality experience, national capability via specific research and skills development, regional impact, and an increase in international standing. In the international domain, these translate into global standing, nationally to government goals on growth, security and skills, regionally to meeting skills needs through collaboration, and at provider level, to specialisation and efficiency.

There was much discussion about collaboration and sharing by providers, as well as a focus on specialisation.

Though the news about increased fees will be welcomed by institutions, I wonder what the reaction will be from prospective students. Yes, student fee debt, is not really debt as often explained by Martin Lewis, but as he says the amount you borrow is mostly irrelevant day to day – it works more like a tax. The reality is that extra 9% tax on earnings above £25,000 will make a difference, in terms of things like mortgage affordability, but also when comparing graduate income levels to non-graduate income levels. Throw in the temptations of a degree apprenticeship where there are no fees and debts (and you get paid). Could we see a paradigm shift in young people going to university? There is no longer talk about 50% of young people going to university, this has been swapped with the two-thirds under-25 participation in higher-level learning.

Next week we have a Korean delegation from KERIS visiting us in our London offices. With over twenty five delegates there was some logistical stuff to sort out, as well as my travel.

I continued working on the E in NREN project, planning for two workshops in November, as well as thinking about a session at TNC 26 in Helsinki in June next year.

At the end of the week I was in Glasgow for the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C). This year it is both shorter than usual, later than usual. Unlike previous conferences, it is taking place in a hotel rather than an university. In the past ALT-C was a three day conference, this year it was concentrated into two days.

I really enjoyed and got a lot out of the conference. I have been part of this community for over twenty years, attending my first ALT-C back in 2003.

Hanging out in Glasgow for ALT-C

Glasgow

This week I am in Glasgow for the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C). This year it is both shorter than usual, later than usual, and in a twist isn’t in Manchester or Warwick, but in Glasgow. Also unlike previous conferences, it is taking place in a hotel rather than an university. I suspect the reason for the hotel is that it is taking place in October so there would be no conference availability at an university campus.

My first ALT-C was back in 2002, which was at Sheffield. I have written about this event before, back then I didn’t think it was the conference for me. So, much so, that when ALT-C 2003 took place in Exeter (which is literally just down the road from me) I didn’t go. I did go to Manchester in 2004 and really enjoyed the conference.

Since then I have been nearly every year, though I did miss last year’s conference.

I am not presenting this year, I was way too late for the submission deadline. So, as a delegate I am interested in looking at the current landscape for learning technology in higher education, as well as having conversations about student mobility, collaboration and shared services.

Making preparations – Weeknote #346 – 17th October

laptop
Image by fancycrave1 from Pixabay

Though I tested negative for covid I am still feeling the after effects of having had covid. I am not too surprised by this as my last experience with covid back in 2021 was horrific. This week though I was mainly working from home. I had planned to get to the Bristol office, but there were some issues with the car park.

I spent time planning various trips, conferences, events and visits that are happening over the next few months.

I was supporting the planning and design of some workshops that will take place in Amsterdam in November.

Next week I am in Glasgow for ALT-C. I didn’t go last year for various reasons, though I did enjoy attending in 2023 at Warwick. I am not presenting, but am interested in having conversations about collaboration, sharing, and student mobility.

Traitorous cooperation – Weeknote #345 – 10th October

The week before I was quite unwell with covid. I was getting better, so I did another test and this one came back negative. I wasn’t 100%, but I did think I was well enough to travel to Birmingham for a couple of days. We had a team away day on Tuesday and an all staff conference on the Wednesday.

Jisc is very much a hybrid geographically distributed organisation across the UK, so more often than not, conversations and discussion is over Teams. So, it makes a nice change to actually meet in person and chat and discuss stuff.

On Monday the day before I headed off to Birmingham, we had a meeting about collaboration. I was reminded of the article I wrote on blocking collaboration back in 2022.

Collaboration is defined in the dictionary as: traitorous cooperation with an enemy. That may not mean what we think when we say collaboration. Of course there is another definition which is: the action of working with someone to produce something.

I concluded that collaboration does require teams to plan and think about their ways of working. Compromises have to be made to ensure effective collaboration. You have to trust, and trust is a two way street.

It is looking like I will be travelling to the Netherlands quite a bit over the next few months delivering workshops and attending various meetings. One of things I will need to do before all that is renew my passport. In theory I have just under three months left on my passport, reality is that I need to have at least three months left on my passport if I am going to travel. I will be losing my nice burgundy passport and getting a new blue one.

The BBC reports on an UCU analysis which shows universities have collectively announced more than 12,000 job cuts in the last year. The article discusses not just the closure of courses, but also cuts to services for students. Could the ongoing financial crisis for the sector actually become worse, as some young people decide that an deprecated student experience isn’t the experience that they want from university, and choose a different path.

Back to Covid – Weeknote #344 – 3rd October

man with facemask
Image by pisauikan from Pixabay

Felt rough on Monday, signed myself off sick, read this BBC report, and said to myself, James you’ve got Covid.

If you feel unwell with a bad throat and a temperature you may well have caught one of the new strains of Covid circulating this autumn. XFG, called Stratus by some, and NB.1.8.1, known as Nimbus, are now the most common variants being passed around in the UK, according to officials, external.

Got some tests.

Yes, I have Covid.

Going Dutch – Weeknote #343 – 26th September

This week I was in the Netherlands in the main for a GÉANT TF-EDU (Education Taskforce) meeting but was also attending the 1EdTech Learning Impact conference before ending the week meeting up with Dutch colleagues from SURF.

I was quite impressed that Amsterdam was only a one hour flight time from Bristol to Amsterdam, so spent longer at Bristol waiting for boarding, and just as long at Amsterdam going through passport control. You have to say the process of doing this at one end for the Eurostar and DFDS ferries at Dover makes the disembarkation process so much faster.

The first part of the week was spent in Delft, which I have never been to before. It’s a beautiful city, though as is the case with attending meetings and conferences, I spent a lot of time in the conference venue, with just a short amount of time to explore and enjoy the sights of Delft.

I hadn’t originally planned to attend 1EdTech Learning Impact conference when I was doing my conference planning earlier in the year, but it was recommended to me by my SURF colleagues and when I looked over the programme I saw that my CEO Heidi was presenting.

Though the education landscape across Europe has a lot of similarities with the UK there are also lots of differences.

When I was at the Western Colleges Consortium back in the 2000s I was very much aware of the standards issues and interoperability. Now looking at the current landscape, standards and interoperability at an institutional level is mature.

Whereas standards and interoperability at a national level is challenging, especially in relation to student mobility and LLE requirements. Though students can move between institutions it is a difficult process with a lot of duplication and repetition. Access, authentication, and authorisation also becomes a barrier rather than an enabler. Standards and interoperability at an international level is virtually non-existent, especially in relation to student mobility.

Alongside the planned meetings and the conference, I also engaged in various side meetings and conversations with European colleagues, and UK based delegates.

Pondering about podcasting

Microphone
Image by rafabendo from Pixabay

A couple of months back I chaired a session at Jisc’s Connect More event on podcasting. The podcasting session was delivered by Mark Childs from Durham with support with a recorded segment by Puiyin Wong from Birmingham.

The initial discussion before the presentation made me go back and look at when I started publishing my elearning stuff podcast. This was back in March 2008, enabled and inspired by the LSN’s MoLeNET programme. The first few episodes were mainly me speaking, but wasn’t long before I was recording panel discussions talking about stuff about e-learning.

However I had been listening to podcasts for a few years before that. I discovered podcasting when a webpage I had created about wireless zero configuration was discussed as part of an US radio tech podcast. The host of that show had a range of podcasts, and I started listening to them. Those podcasts did influence the format and structure of my podcasting recordings.

When I changed jobs and roles in 2013 I didn’t have the time and resources to record new episodes of the podcast. I did a few more episodes over the years following. However my usual panellists also changed jobs, roles, or even retired.

The last time I published a podcast was way back in September 2018, which was when I was at the ALT Conference in Manchester.

I did think I might be able to reboot the podcast when covid struck the UK, but even then I didn’t really have the time and importantly the space to do it.

Since then I have talked about rebooting, but haven’t yet made the leap to actually make some new recordings.

Is that going to change? Well probably not, but never say never.

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past – Weeknote #342 – 19th September

This week I actually spent three days of my working week, working in the Bristol office. It was a very busy office, and as a result there was a real buzz. Some of my colleagues in my team were also in the office, so there was much discussion and in-person collaboration.

The beginning of the week I was in a meeting looking at improving internal communication and collaboration within our directorate. It was an interesting meeting.

Spent a lot of time on organising and planning next week. I am off to the Netherlands for a GÉANT TF-EDU (Education Taskforce) meeting in Delft and then will be attending the 1EdTech Learning Impact conference before ending the week meeting up with Dutch colleagues from SURF. I helped put together a presentation which Jisc will be presenting next week at the conference looking at sharing and collaboration.

I did look at travel options for the trip; my first choice was to actually drive and use the Harwich Hook of Holland ferry. Though this would take a lot more time, most of which would be driving to Harwich in Essex, which with charging would be a six or even seven hour drive followed by an eight hour ferry crossing. Another option was to catch the train. There are direct trains from London to Amsterdam, but the timings are challenging as it is a nearly a five hour train journey, but I would need to get to London first, and then at the other end get to Delft. In the end it was easier, quicker (and cheaper) to fly from Bristol. It’s a seventy-five minute flight, though I have to get from Schiphol to Delft, however that is less than an hour away on the train.

lecture theatre
Image by Wokandapix from Pixabay

The OfS has proposed a revised TEF (Teaching Excellence Framework) and is consulting how it assesses and regulates higher education. One key point is putting a lower burden on high-quality institutions; and increased scrutiny on weaker ones. There is still some reliance on NSS scores, which we know sometimes skews how universities interact with students.

There’s something for everyone in the latest rethink of the Teaching Excellence Framework, but as David Kernohan suggests at WonkHE, bringing disparate approaches together can highlight fundamental weaknesses.

Secession

engineer working on hardware
Image by This_is_Engineering from Pixabay

Could a university department secede from their university and become independent? This was the idea behind a vision piece I wrote last year. I recently published a couple of vision pieces on the blog, one on the The University Group™ and another on The Specialist University Centre. This vision about secession is similar to the specialist centre, but goes further.

Created by experts to inspire (and possibly scare) us into thinking about what a preferable future for higher education might look like.

Though the concept of economies of scale means that the concept of a large university, spreading costs and overheads across a range of provision was seen by many as a cost effective solution, the growing impact of reduced funding, fixed student fees; saw university departments being forced to cut costs. There was a spread of discontent that this was having a negative impact on the student experience and the quality of the research being undertaken. There was also a strong feeling across staff and management of many departments of these decisions being done to them and they having no say in the decision making process.

University departments already had some element of autonomy, so it wasn’t too long before some departments decided to secede from the university and form their own “university” to take back control. These departments wanted to have more power over the recruitment of students and staff. They were able to outsource administrative and professional services to subsidiary service companies that delivered services to a large number of these autonomous departments. With the wealth of empty office space across major cities, it was relatively easy to procure space, combined with online provision, and hybrid home working, the costs of running a department of a university, divorced from the university itself, could be minimised. The use of shared services across these small independent universities enabled them to focus on research, learning and teaching. With no large overheads being top sliced from the income, they could invest more in learning and teaching. Some departments even decided that teaching was a distraction and focused on research alone.

Learning and teaching was often a blend of physical in-person provision combined with online delivery and resources. The use of online and digital resources meant that library provision was entirely online. Even then the use of print on demand, meant those students who wanted physical books and journals could have them delivered overnight.

For many prospective students, these new independent departmental universities were a real attraction, allowing them to fit their studies easily into their work life balance. Going to university wasn’t always an option for all prospective students, the focused and specialised provision of these providers was meeting a real demand.

Once a few high profile departments had done this, it wasn’t long before there was an avalanche of universities finding themselves breaking up. In some cases legislation was enabled that allowed those departments to retain not just their staff, but also their departmental buildings and campuses. Legislation was passed enabling these departments became small independent universities. They started to market themselves, mainly using online tools and services.

The ease at which cloud services could be obtained and the increase in the availability of independent professional services, and service companies, resulted in keeping administration costs to a minimum.

The break-up of the large universities into smaller departmental universities, also detached many university functions and services. There was no longer a need to centralise student accommodation, often halls of residences would be either sold off as they were no longer needed, or effectively privatised. University catering was closed off, and national chains took over the spaces.

Student support became a service that was bought in as and when required.

Some university campuses which consisted only of independent subject departments, the university administration became more of caretaker and administrator for these departments, akin to the science parks of their day.