Tag Archives: change

Pouring creativity

At LWF12 one of the speakers was Mitchel Resnick.

Mitchel Resnick’s Lifelong Kindergarten research group developed the ideas and technologies underlying the LEGO Mindstorms robotic kits and the Scratch programming software used by millions of young people around the world. With these technologies, young people learn to design, create, experiment, and invent with new technologies, not merely browse, chat, and interact. Mitch’s ideas and work are now at the centre of the debate about the curriculum for ICT in schools. Should children simply learn to use standard applications and games, or should they also have the opportunity to become creators?

Mitchel Resnick made the interesting observation that rather than trying to make Kindergarten (early years) more like school and college, we should be trying to make school and college more like early years.

What he seemed to mean by this was that in early years children learn by thinking, invention and creativity. Whereas when they get older we think of them more as vessels that we pour content into.

Of course there are lots of teachers out there who do use thinking, invention and creativity. Likewise there are lots of teachers out there that fall back on worksheets and talking at the learners; pouring content into them.

The key question and I am not sure how we can answer this, is what proportion of each kind are there? Are they that distinct, or can a teacher be creative one day and fall back on passive transference on the next. I am pretty sure most people enter the teaching profession because they want to be help young people and to support learning and not pour content into learners.

I agree with Mitchel that technology offers a range of opportunities and possibilities to enable learners to be creative. The key question is how do teachers who weren’t at the conference find out about the possibilities of invention and creativity? How do they “change”?

Why are some teachers already using these strategies and why are some not? It can’t just be about time, staff development and resources. How can some teachers be innovative and some not?

Why aren’t teachers using these strategies in the classroom already? What are the barriers that are stopping teachers? Are they real barriers or just perceptions? How do we overcome these barriers? How do we identify the barriers? How do we ensure that we identify the real barriers to change and not just those that we assume to be the barriers?

Change is challenging, partly as people don’t like to change. Change also implies we know where we are and where we need to go.

The Student as the Agent of Change

At FOTE11 James Clay from Gloucestershire College discusses that in many institutions the structures, processes and procedures we have in place are there for many reasons; these may be for security, safety, financial, prevention, health and safety. Often change is blocked by these same reasons; reasons that exist because of politics, inertia and because we have always done it that way. It is easier not to change.

The result is that learners can often find that their learning experience is one of challenges, difficulties and frustration. Institutions that listen and act on the voice of their learners can find that students can be agents of change.

See the slides from my presentation and more thoughts.

Agents of Change – FOTiE 2011

The view from the stage #fote11

This week was the fourth Future of Technology in Education or FOTiE and the third one I have spoken at. I missed the first FOTiE as it wasn’t on my radar until it was too late, however I did follow the tweets and thought I must attend the following year.

As it was, I was asked to speak at the second FOTiE and presented on what I thought the future of learning would be.

I have used that presentation as the basis for other keynotes I have done at other events.

Last year I really enjoyed delivering a session called the iPad is the future of reading.

This year I looked at the concept of students as agents of change. What I wanted to do first was look at students and learners and how they are viewed by institutions, at best an inconvenience, at worse a security threat and quite dangerous! I then wanted people to think about why we should engage with learners and how to do this.

These are the slides from my presentation at the Future of Technology in Education 2011.

In many institutions the structures, processes and procedures we have in place are there for many reasons; these may be for security, safety, financial, prevention, health and safety. Often change is blocked by these same reasons; reasons that exist because of politics, inertia and because we have always done it that way. It is easier not to change.

The result is that learners can often find that their learning experience is one of challenges, difficulties and frustration. Institutions that listen and act on the voice of their learners can find that students can be agents of change.

As you would guess as all learners are individuals and have different needs, you need to use a range of approaches and strategies in order to engage students.

You also shouldn’t assume that learners necessarily know what they want. Usually they want something which is familiar, but better.

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”

Henry Ford

It is never just about asking learners what they want, but about ensuring that learners know what is possible and what the benefits that these possibilities can bring to them.

“A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them.”

Steve Jobs, 1998

In order to provide real change and ensure that the learners are engaged in that change is to offer students real choices about what could change and the impact of that change.

So how are you engaging with learners to support change within your institution?


Enhancing Learning – RSC Eastern eFair

My keynote presentation from last week’s RSC eFair.

The world is changing.

Technologies are changing.

Learning is changing.

Our learners are changing. How they learn, where they learn and with whom they learn, all are changing.

Web 2.0 technologies allow learners to remove the social, geographical and physical barriers to communicate and learn with others.

Mobile technologies allow learners to be more mobile and be able to access learning and learning communities in ways which have never been possible before.

Both allow for an enhanced and enriched learning experience.

James Clay has extensive experience of mobile learning and has a vision that goes beyond mobile technologies and focuses on the mobility of the learner, blurring the demarcation between formal and informal learning. His current vision for education encompasses the use of Web 2.0 technologies embedded into an institutional VLE which can be accessed through mobile technologies. Allowing learners a focal point for their studying, whilst allowing the depth and breadth of Web 2.0 to bring a personalised learning experience to students at a time and space to suit them.

For the future, James hopes that institutions and others will allow for a flexible, personalised, accessible learning experience for all.

View the section of Martin Bean’s ALT-C 2009 keynote that deals with resistance to innovation.

#036 e-Learning Stuff Podcast: Cultural Change

With James Clay, Mick Mullane and David Sugden.

It’s not just about the technology, it’s also about the culture of the organisation when it comes to embedding learning technologies and e-learning. Cultural change often needs to happen if there is to be transformation within an educational institutiuon.

This is the thirty sixth e-Learning Stuff Podcast, Cultural Change

Download the podcast in mp3 format: Cultural Change

Subscribe to the podcast in iTunes

Shownotes